http://ldsmediatalk.com/2008/03/14/keeping-wikipedia-entries-accurate/ Sharing technology ideas for LDS parents and youth Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:56:22 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://ldsmediatalk.com/2008/03/14/keeping-wikipedia-entries-accurate/comment-page-1/#comment-24921 Wikipedia and the Cognitive Surplus | LDS Media Talk Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:03:04 +0000 http://www.ldsmediatalk.com/2008/03/14/keeping-wikipedia-entries-accurate/#comment-24921 [...] contributing to Wikipedia articles yourself.  I echo Larry Richman’s comments in his post Keeping Wikipedia Entries Accurate, and encourage individuals to review Wikipedia entries about the Church for accuracy and edit and [...] [...] contributing to Wikipedia articles yourself.  I echo Larry Richman’s comments in his post Keeping Wikipedia Entries Accurate, and encourage individuals to review Wikipedia entries about the Church for accuracy and edit and [...]

]]> http://ldsmediatalk.com/2008/03/14/keeping-wikipedia-entries-accurate/comment-page-1/#comment-12904 Silus Grok Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:30:57 +0000 http://www.ldsmediatalk.com/2008/03/14/keeping-wikipedia-entries-accurate/#comment-12904 Amen… moreover, I would caution to only correct for points of fact — and not on matters that are subjective or not entirely settled. Amen… moreover, I would caution to only correct for points of fact — and not on matters that are subjective or not entirely settled.

]]> http://ldsmediatalk.com/2008/03/14/keeping-wikipedia-entries-accurate/comment-page-1/#comment-12899 Nick Literski Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:04:05 +0000 http://www.ldsmediatalk.com/2008/03/14/keeping-wikipedia-entries-accurate/#comment-12899 I would only caution that those who "review entries for accuracy" should be certain that they're actually informed of the accurate facts. LDS blogs are rampant with posts by individuals, including LDS individuals, who make historical/factual claims that are entirely mistaken. I would only caution that those who “review entries for accuracy” should be certain that they’re actually informed of the accurate facts. LDS blogs are rampant with posts by individuals, including LDS individuals, who make historical/factual claims that are entirely mistaken.

]]>