<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Awareness of LDS.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ldsmediatalk.com/2007/03/29/awareness-of-ldsorg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ldsmediatalk.com/2007/03/29/awareness-of-ldsorg/</link>
	<description>Sharing technology ideas for LDS parents and youth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:36:27 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roger Brown</title>
		<link>http://ldsmediatalk.com/2007/03/29/awareness-of-ldsorg/comment-page-1/#comment-2153</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 21:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ldsmediatalk.com/2007/03/29/awareness-of-ldsorg/#comment-2153</guid>
		<description>The Daily Herald wrote:
&gt; &quot;The first version of LDS.org, Richman&#039;s &quot;four or five static pages,&quot; went up in 1994, when the World Wide Web was only just beginning to seep into the public consciousness. The site was largely unchanged until 1998, when a number of small, mostly cosmetic tweaks were applied.&quot;

I remember checking http://lds.org at least once a month in the middle 90&#039;s and there was only 1 page there until February 1997.  There was only 1 page, before Feb. 97 not 4 or 5 like the article says.  This is at least the second time I&#039;ve read that misstatement.

You can check online backups to verify that my memory is correct.
Go to http://archive.org and search.
You&#039;ll find (http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://lds.org ) that there was only a place holder page in 96 and before.

I hope that Richman or whoever the PR people are will correct themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Daily Herald wrote:<br />
&gt; &#8220;The first version of LDS.org, Richman&#8217;s &#8220;four or five static pages,&#8221; went up in 1994, when the World Wide Web was only just beginning to seep into the public consciousness. The site was largely unchanged until 1998, when a number of small, mostly cosmetic tweaks were applied.&#8221;</p>
<p>I remember checking <a href="http://lds.org" rel="nofollow">http://lds.org</a> at least once a month in the middle 90&#8217;s and there was only 1 page there until February 1997.  There was only 1 page, before Feb. 97 not 4 or 5 like the article says.  This is at least the second time I&#8217;ve read that misstatement.</p>
<p>You can check online backups to verify that my memory is correct.<br />
Go to <a href="http://archive.org" rel="nofollow">http://archive.org</a> and search.<br />
You&#8217;ll find (<a href="http://web.archive.org/web/" rel="nofollow">http://web.archive.org/web/</a>*/http://lds.org ) that there was only a place holder page in 96 and before.</p>
<p>I hope that Richman or whoever the PR people are will correct themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
